Richard the 3rd @ June 17, 2012 1:08 PM
Kadesh @ June 17, 2012 4:36 PM

Originally posted by: crunkmooseOriginally posted by: Kadesh
...does the "ill" of future non-existence compare?
Given the small number of people who are gay and the already rampant overpopulation of the human species, how the bloody fucking hell do you get that that is even a realistic possibility?
And, no.. something theoretically possible bur realistically so improbable as to be all but impossible is not comparable to very real and currently epidemic medical ills.
Happy fathers day man!
If that doesn't check out with you, how is the low percentage of actual people being persecuted valid? ....I'm just saying wrong is wrong. It's not just a fad for a time to cut down the "overpopulation." There is ancient proof of people being gay. It's not natural that homosexuality doesn't work the way "evolution" is supposed to work. Evolution works by repopulating to a better state of perfection. How come homosexuals can't pass on the "gay" gene if they can't reproduce? How do you suppose evolution is working with a people that can't recreate.
"Homosexuality" isn't natural and didn't come together through natural selection because "homosexuality" can't recreate itself. Must be something else that causes it. What do you suppose causes certain humans to be homosexual, and certain not too?
crunkmoose @ June 17, 2012 5:19 PM
"how is the low percentage of actual people being persecuted valid?"Re-read that.
""Homosexuality" isn't natural"
It occurs in nature. Get the fuck over it.
"How do you suppose evolution is working with a people that can't recreate. "
You don't actually understand how genetics works, do you? Same way people who don't have red hair can have kids with red hair.
Richard the 3rd @ June 17, 2012 5:25 PM
Kadesh @ June 17, 2012 6:28 PM
crunkmoose @ June 17, 2012 7:21 PM

Originally posted by: Kadesh
Yeah, I know homosexuality is totally in nature....homo just doesn't make sense with the evolution philosophy. Just ,why does homosexuality exist? really there's no point to discuss this,i know in my life I believe what I believe,u do too. I just like discussing this crap.
It just doesn't make sense... as long as you know fuckall about evolution to begin with.. to the point that you call it a fucking philosophy.
Let me guess.. it doesn't make sense to you because it doesn't benefit the species, which you think is the point of evolution... which it is not. Go read a science book, you ignorant twat.
crunkmoose @ June 17, 2012 10:29 PM

Originally posted by: Kadesh
benefit the species? I never said that is the evolution stance,not even like it. I don't think I'll tell you what I believe it is, because you'll twist my words anyhow, always have. No point to discuss.
Have a good day.
What you believe it is? If you had ever bothered to study what you so often decry beyond taking science classes in high school you might actually know what that would be rather than just what you "believe" it to be. I know it can be hard for you to understand, but some people actually study things and actually know things rather than just guessing.. which you seem to prefer doing when it comes to science, history, politics, religion, etc...
Richard the 3rd @ June 18, 2012 3:41 AM

Originally posted by: crunkmooseOriginally posted by: Kadesh
benefit the species? I never said that is the evolution stance,not even like it. I don't think I'll tell you what I believe it is, because you'll twist my words anyhow, always have. No point to discuss.
Have a good day.
What you believe it is? If you had ever bothered to study what you so often decry beyond taking science classes in high school you might actually know what that would be rather than just what you "believe" it to be. I know it can be hard for you to understand, but some people actually study things and actually know things rather than just guessing.. which you seem to prefer doing when it comes to science, history, politics, religion, etc...
matt is the kind of christian who will never let facts change his oppinion
